<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eikonoklastes by Michael Hartl: Crazy futurist stuff</title>
    <link>http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/2006/06/12/crazy-futurist-stuff</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>where nothing is sacred</description>
    <item>
      <title>Crazy futurist stuff</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/category/crazy-futurist-stuff"&gt;(Part 1 of 4)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Warning: may cause  &lt;a href="http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?s=future+shock"&gt;future
    shock&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m interested in a variety of (possibly not-so-)crazy futurist stuff. 
Most of it falls under the category of &amp;#8220;transhumanism&amp;#8221;, a philosophy that
emphasizes the value of human beings (as in classical humanism) together with
the transformative power of technology (which may eventually allow humans to
transcend their current biological and cognitive limitations).   The &lt;a href="http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html"&gt;World Transhumanist
Association FAQ&lt;/a&gt; is an articulate and mind-bending introduction to
transhumanism and related ideas, and it greatly repays careful study and
contemplation. My favorite brand of transhumanism is &lt;a href="http://www.extropy.org/"&gt;extropianism&lt;/a&gt;, which emphasizes the
spontaneous emergence of order and the importance of individual liberty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; The Two Big Things in this area (in my view) are &lt;em&gt;nanotechnology&lt;/em&gt;
and &lt;em&gt;artificial intelligence&lt;/em&gt;.  In both cases, there is an essential
theme: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Many proposed advanced technologies (including nanotechnology and
artificial intelligence) are consistent with physical law.  Their successful
realization is hence a problem of &lt;em&gt;practice&lt;/em&gt;, not
&lt;em&gt;principle&lt;/em&gt;&amp;mdash;and therefore probably a matter of &lt;em&gt;when&lt;/em&gt;, not
&lt;em&gt;if&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Often, arguments against the &amp;#8220;feasibility&amp;#8221; of nanotechnology and
artificial intelligence&amp;mdash;that is, against the possibility of the
&lt;em&gt;short-term&lt;/em&gt; development of these technologies&amp;mdash;imply that the
technologies themselves are impossible.  This is reminiscent of early
arguments against heavier-than-air flight or rocketry: well-meaning scientists
and engineers pointed out that, e.g., a heavier rocket would need more fuel,
which would further weigh down the rocket, requiring still more fuel, etc.,
etc.  These arguments were perfectly correct, since the technical barriers
were indeed high, but they obscured the underlying issue: no physical
principle prohibits the existence of airplanes or rockets.  Eventually,
advances in technology answered all their objections, and &lt;a href="http://www.foresight.org/News/negativeComments.html"&gt;many ended up
looking foolish&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Of course, simply because a technology is possible doesn&amp;#8217;t mean that it
will be developed on a reasonable timescale.  Making timelines and projections
is a tricky business, but there are many reasons to believe that the
technology envisioned by transhumanists will arrive some time this century.  A
good web resource on this subject is Ray Kurzweil&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0134.html"&gt;essay
on the Law of Accelerating Returns&lt;/a&gt;; I also highly recommend  Kurzweil&amp;#8217;s
books &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0140282025/102-6855786-6500910?v=glance"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The
Age of Spiritual Machines&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0670033847/qid=1135643352/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-3685025-2247003?n=507846&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;v=glance"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The
Singularity Is Near&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  I would be surprised if Kurzweil&amp;#8217;s predictions
are correct in their details, and he may be off by decades in some of his
bolder claims, but he marshals convincing arguments in support of his central
thesis: our na&amp;iuml;ve &lt;em&gt;linear&lt;/em&gt; intuition leads to systematic
underestimates of &lt;em&gt;exponential&lt;/em&gt; technological change.  As a result,
many dramatic technological advances will happen much sooner than most people
expect.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:70f907a2-946f-4954-ab54-257187861c39</guid>
      <author>Michael Hartl</author>
      <link>http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/2006/06/12/crazy-futurist-stuff</link>
      <category>Science &amp; Technology</category>
      <category>Crazy futurist stuff</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
