<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eikonoklastes by Michael Hartl: Open borders</title>
    <link>http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/2006/05/31/open-borders</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>where nothing is sacred</description>
    <item>
      <title>Open borders</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My friend Sumit mentioned some problems with &lt;a href="http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/2006/05/17/on-immigration"&gt;open borders&lt;/a&gt; unrelated to economic issues.  He raises good points; there are significant challenges associated with assimilating immigrants.  Will they learn English?  Will they overwhelm native culture?  Will they believe in the essentials of America&amp;#8217;s Constitutional republic?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suspect that immigrants are still a net win, but I agree with Sumit that 100m new Americans could have negative effects.  In any case, the core point of my previous post remains: the pseudo-economic arguments against immigration are bogus.  And even if we don&amp;#8217;t open the borders, it is clear to me that the US can and should welcome many more immigrants&amp;#8212;both skilled and unskilled&amp;#8212;to the land of opportunity.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 21:29:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:042b6c2e-6201-452a-99b6-2691fa28bd79</guid>
      <author>Michael Hartl</author>
      <link>http://eikonoklastes.org/articles/2006/05/31/open-borders</link>
      <category>Economics</category>
      <category>Politics</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
